Home / Seattle Condos / Capitol Hill / Vertigo / Ugliest condo building in Seattle?

Ugliest condo building in Seattle?

By Matt Goyer October 4, 2006

I recently had two people contact me within a twenty four hour window about a condo conversion on Capitol Hill. Apparently this place was hideous. Here’s what one friend had to say:

Have you walked by it lately? Prior to turning it into condos they 1) cut down the huge birch trees on the corner and 2) painted the building in bright and clashing blues, greens and pinks. It used to be a nice building. Now I weep whenever I walk to QFC. I Weep!

Can you please bring public shame to this eye-sore? (I know your disability [ed: I’m color blind] may prevent you from noticing how bad these colours look, but it’s truly awful.)

So I trekked up to Republican and Bolyston Saturday morning on the way to the grocery store, stopped, gawked, and took a few photos.

IMGP4607 Hosted on Zooomr

While taking this photo someone came out and asked me if I was taking a photo because the place was hideous. And the answer was yes, yes I was. This place is just hideous. The photo doesn’t even convey how hideous it is, go walk by it. Its no surprise that their website, does not have any exterior photos! (And please, put your square footages on the floor plans.)

IMGP4609 Hosted on Zooomr

Needless to say, don’t buy here, even though they do have granite (we need to send a message to developers that granite countertops does not mean your project is desirabl!) You will be mocked. I also welcome submissions of condo projects that you feel are uglier.

Update: The Stranger discusses this ugly ass building here, Re: PI Credulous on Conversions and has some choice quotes in the comments:

Speaking of their tag line, my friends and I made up a new game where we remix up the words, add new ones but make sure it has the same “ag” and “ase” ending. Such as (a few favorites)

“The shroud of Turin is a burlap bag, this is Jesus’ Face.”

“This city is a burlap bag, this is your face”

“The city is a speedy fag, get in the race”

“This building is about to sag, grab the mace”

there are many, many more. I suggest you and your friends play it too!

Post sponsored by: We are one of the reliable postcards printing companies online. Check on some of our real estate postcards designs we have on the site and you’ll be surprised about the wealth of design options we have that fits any industry you’re in. Visit us today!

I own and manage Urban Living, a boutique Seattle and Bellevue real estate brokerage. I love lofts, floating homes, new construction, and mid-century moderns, but I will help you buy or sell just about anything!

Get in touch to:

Understand the market
Find your perfect home
Sell your home

Contact:
[email protected]
206-203-6242

68 responses to “Ugliest condo building in Seattle?”

jo says:

October 5, 2006 at 5:02 pm

That marketing is right up there with Onyx.

Under amenities: “Our onsite fitness center will keep you fashionably thin.”

So I guess they don’t want any fat people in there?
jo says:

October 5, 2006 at 12:02 pm

That marketing is right up there with Onyx.

Under amenities: “Our onsite fitness center will keep you fashionably thin.”

So I guess they don’t want any fat people in there?
J-Dog says:

October 5, 2006 at 7:48 pm

Just looking at it gives me Vertigo!
J-Dog says:

October 5, 2006 at 2:48 pm

Just looking at it gives me Vertigo!
Seattle Condos and Lofts » Vertigo Condos - Capitol Hill says:

October 6, 2006 at 1:41 pm

[…] Matt at Urban Living.com wrote an entry about this new conversion in the heart of Capitol Hill. Unfortunately, for Vertigo, the readers of Urban Living.com aren’t so impressed. […]
Lisa says:

October 16, 2006 at 1:33 am

Not only the colors are bad, the actual paint job is terrible. There is smeared teal on the white areas, paint sploches on the railings and it looks like water drips on the tacky paint.
I can’t believe someone is going to pay $400,000 to live there (and someone will!).

And I miss that great tree.
Lisa says:

October 15, 2006 at 8:33 pm

Not only the colors are bad, the actual paint job is terrible. There is smeared teal on the white areas, paint sploches on the railings and it looks like water drips on the tacky paint.
I can’t believe someone is going to pay $400,000 to live there (and someone will!).

And I miss that great tree.
Celeste Tanner says:

October 19, 2006 at 5:25 pm

Hi:

I’m a former tenant in that building, and my partner was the person who asked why you were taking the photos. We completely agree with your assessment. The inside of the place was a little wacky looking, but the exterior is now a complete eyesore.

I’d ask what the developer – The Gintz Group, of Tacoma – was thinking, but I already know the answer has dollar signs in it. Clearly, they have a really different idea of the “Seattle sensibility” than most of the people I’ve met here.

Unfortunately, it’s going to be even uglier for the buyer when they start having problems with the very slapdash “quickie” conversion. The day I finished moving out, they’d just spray painted silver over the brass doorknobs – they’re not even buying new locks. They need to look carefully for the mould and water leakage problems that have been painted over and perhaps look for the cracks in the back units of the building from earthquake damage that is being covered up, but not really repaired.
Celeste Tanner says:

October 19, 2006 at 12:25 pm

Hi:

I’m a former tenant in that building, and my partner was the person who asked why you were taking the photos. We completely agree with your assessment. The inside of the place was a little wacky looking, but the exterior is now a complete eyesore.

I’d ask what the developer – The Gintz Group, of Tacoma – was thinking, but I already know the answer has dollar signs in it. Clearly, they have a really different idea of the “Seattle sensibility” than most of the people I’ve met here.

Unfortunately, it’s going to be even uglier for the buyer when they start having problems with the very slapdash “quickie” conversion. The day I finished moving out, they’d just spray painted silver over the brass doorknobs – they’re not even buying new locks. They need to look carefully for the mould and water leakage problems that have been painted over and perhaps look for the cracks in the back units of the building from earthquake damage that is being covered up, but not really repaired.
Tammy says:

October 19, 2006 at 9:52 pm

I looked at an apartment on the 3rd floor there once. Unless they plan to do some major remodeling the floor plans are misleading – see the actual unit before buying if you’re silly enough to consider it. The one I looked at you’d have to be a size 0 to be comfortable in the “kitchen” area in the unit I looked at. It was about two and a half feet wide – I kid you not!

Honest to goodness though – given how poorly they’ve treated the tennants there I can’t imagine wanting to do business with these people…
Tammy says:

October 19, 2006 at 4:52 pm

I looked at an apartment on the 3rd floor there once. Unless they plan to do some major remodeling the floor plans are misleading – see the actual unit before buying if you’re silly enough to consider it. The one I looked at you’d have to be a size 0 to be comfortable in the “kitchen” area in the unit I looked at. It was about two and a half feet wide – I kid you not!

Honest to goodness though – given how poorly they’ve treated the tennants there I can’t imagine wanting to do business with these people…
Red says:

October 19, 2006 at 10:02 pm

Just an extra piece of information or two:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/287796_tenant06.html

And their open houses start this weekend (from 11-3). Should anyone wish to offer feedback in person.
Red says:

October 19, 2006 at 5:02 pm

Just an extra piece of information or two:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/287796_tenant06.html

And their open houses start this weekend (from 11-3). Should anyone wish to offer feedback in person.
mattgoyer says:

October 20, 2006 at 5:41 pm

Here’s a Live journal entry from someone who used to live in the building: http://montykins.livejournal.com/234251.html
Matt says:

October 20, 2006 at 12:41 pm

Here’s a Live journal entry from someone who used to live in the building: http://montykins.livejournal.com/234251.html
gb says:

October 21, 2006 at 7:46 pm

I just went through the open house. I think it is too bad that they didn’t spend more time and money because really tht building has tons of potential and — if don’t correctly –could be a very cool mid-century modern condo. Some of the units are really nice, too, in terms of floorplans, views, etc. Clearly the developer tried to get that mid-century chic thing going, but they just didn’t have the aesthetic down correctly (hence the crazy paint on the exterior!). They put down new wood, bamboo and tile flooring, and the kitchens have the standard wood cabinets and granite counters…but they did not replace any windows, doors, etc. and some of that stuff looks really old. That would be ok, but it should be priced accordingly. What the person who commented said about the developing hiding leak problems and earthquake damage is scary, though!
gb says:

October 21, 2006 at 2:46 pm

I just went through the open house. I think it is too bad that they didn’t spend more time and money because really tht building has tons of potential and — if don’t correctly –could be a very cool mid-century modern condo. Some of the units are really nice, too, in terms of floorplans, views, etc. Clearly the developer tried to get that mid-century chic thing going, but they just didn’t have the aesthetic down correctly (hence the crazy paint on the exterior!). They put down new wood, bamboo and tile flooring, and the kitchens have the standard wood cabinets and granite counters…but they did not replace any windows, doors, etc. and some of that stuff looks really old. That would be ok, but it should be priced accordingly. What the person who commented said about the developing hiding leak problems and earthquake damage is scary, though!
Randy says:

October 25, 2006 at 2:17 pm

When I saw the Vertigo I could not believe how ugly and cheap the building looked. I was shocked. So shocked I decided to do some research to figure out what the deal was. A quick search of David Gintz (CEO) of the Gintz Group explains why this building is so ugly. Based on my search it looks like he is not a developer and is not from Seattle. Several articles have been printed regarding foreclosure mortgage scams and his involvement. Here’s the articles I found http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/285940_mortgagescam21.html
Lori Matsukawa of King 5 News did a special story as well that mentioned David Gintz and his involvement in these mortgage scams.

In my opinion, you’d be crazy to buy a condo in that building, especially from that group led by that guy.
Randy says:

October 25, 2006 at 9:17 am

When I saw the Vertigo I could not believe how ugly and cheap the building looked. I was shocked. So shocked I decided to do some research to figure out what the deal was. A quick search of David Gintz (CEO) of the Gintz Group explains why this building is so ugly. Based on my search it looks like he is not a developer and is not from Seattle. Several articles have been printed regarding foreclosure mortgage scams and his involvement. Here’s the articles I found http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/285940_mortgagescam21.html
Lori Matsukawa of King 5 News did a special story as well that mentioned David Gintz and his involvement in these mortgage scams.

In my opinion, you’d be crazy to buy a condo in that building, especially from that group led by that guy.
DzinR says:

October 25, 2006 at 9:36 pm

I haven’t seen the condo in person, but the marketing — print materials and website kick ass.
DzinR says:

October 25, 2006 at 4:36 pm

I haven’t seen the condo in person, but the marketing — print materials and website kick ass.
artsypoopsy says:

October 25, 2006 at 9:45 pm

The condo takes risks stylistically and definitely won’t blend in. I wish the style of the interiors would have been better translated to the exterior, but whatever.
artsypoopsy says:

October 25, 2006 at 4:45 pm

The condo takes risks stylistically and definitely won’t blend in. I wish the style of the interiors would have been better translated to the exterior, but whatever.
Felix says:

October 25, 2006 at 10:06 pm

Randy, just because a person’s name is mentioned in an article doesn’t mean they are guilty. Whether or not Gintz is a scam artist can not be deduced from your linked article.
Felix says:

October 25, 2006 at 5:06 pm

Randy, just because a person’s name is mentioned in an article doesn’t mean they are guilty. Whether or not Gintz is a scam artist can not be deduced from your linked article.
Felix says:

October 25, 2006 at 10:08 pm

and no, I’m not a Gintz-head.
Felix says:

October 25, 2006 at 5:08 pm

and no, I’m not a Gintz-head.
mattgoyer says:

October 25, 2006 at 10:12 pm

FYI, those last four comments are all from the same IP address and have fishy e-mail addresses so I’m skeptical that Dinzr/artsypoopsy/Felix isn’t a ‘Gintz-head’ or associated with their marketing/sales department :).
Matt says:

October 25, 2006 at 5:12 pm

FYI, those last four comments are all from the same IP address and have fishy e-mail addresses so I’m skeptical that Dinzr/artsypoopsy/Felix isn’t a ‘Gintz-head’ or associated with their marketing/sales department :).
carl says:

October 26, 2006 at 3:30 am

From the pictures I’ve seen the colors are atrocious and I can certainly understand why current tennants are upset. I’ll probably head over there this weekend to take a look at what all the hubbub is about — maybe snap a few shots myself. I think the marketing is pretty sharp though.
carl says:

October 25, 2006 at 10:30 pm

From the pictures I’ve seen the colors are atrocious and I can certainly understand why current tennants are upset. I’ll probably head over there this weekend to take a look at what all the hubbub is about — maybe snap a few shots myself. I think the marketing is pretty sharp though.
Ethan John says:

October 27, 2006 at 3:57 am

Matt, just wanted to say thanks for this. Great stuff for potential buyers. Truly, much appreciated.
Ethan John says:

October 26, 2006 at 10:57 pm

Matt, just wanted to say thanks for this. Great stuff for potential buyers. Truly, much appreciated.
wrp says:

November 15, 2006 at 1:49 am

Ugh. I gag every time I leave for work and pass that place.

And how lame is it that the condo developers’ minions would try to spam a blog?
wrp says:

November 14, 2006 at 8:49 pm

Ugh. I gag every time I leave for work and pass that place.

And how lame is it that the condo developers’ minions would try to spam a blog?
not_too_bad says:

November 15, 2006 at 5:28 am

It could be worse, look at the proliferation of “craftsman style townhomes” throughout Fremont, Wallingford etc. I get to walk past half a dozen or more on my mile walk to work. I would much rather have some diversity, maybe a mid-century modern (not a pathetic attempt at copying one) and maybe some other interesting design attempts in their place. Just my 2c
not_too_bad says:

November 15, 2006 at 12:28 am

It could be worse, look at the proliferation of “craftsman style townhomes” throughout Fremont, Wallingford etc. I get to walk past half a dozen or more on my mile walk to work. I would much rather have some diversity, maybe a mid-century modern (not a pathetic attempt at copying one) and maybe some other interesting design attempts in their place. Just my 2c
Dustin says:

November 15, 2006 at 6:11 am

I admit that the building is ugly. You dont have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. But that Lori Matsukawa article was an opinion filled witchhunt. What was left out of that article were most of the facts.

Such as the homeowners would have lost thier home months sooner if it wasn’t for Mr Gintz. It also didnt mention that they neglected to pay on thier lease for many months before they were evicted. And they were evicted according to the law. What kind of landlord would let a tenant stay in a home where they dont make thier payments. Thats just proposterous.

Mr Gintz has done a lot of good, for a lot of people. My own parents were going to be forced out of thier home if it werent for him. With his assistance they were able to get out of the home with money in thier pockets. Instead of getting kicked out by the bank.

If it wasnt for him, many other people would have been in the same boat, or actually living on the street with thier credit and in some cases thier lives ruined. So before you make up your mind, know that there are two sides to the story.
Dustin says:

November 15, 2006 at 1:11 am

I admit that the building is ugly. You dont have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. But that Lori Matsukawa article was an opinion filled witchhunt. What was left out of that article were most of the facts.

Such as the homeowners would have lost thier home months sooner if it wasn’t for Mr Gintz. It also didnt mention that they neglected to pay on thier lease for many months before they were evicted. And they were evicted according to the law. What kind of landlord would let a tenant stay in a home where they dont make thier payments. Thats just proposterous.

Mr Gintz has done a lot of good, for a lot of people. My own parents were going to be forced out of thier home if it werent for him. With his assistance they were able to get out of the home with money in thier pockets. Instead of getting kicked out by the bank.

If it wasnt for him, many other people would have been in the same boat, or actually living on the street with thier credit and in some cases thier lives ruined. So before you make up your mind, know that there are two sides to the story.
Jeno says:

November 22, 2006 at 7:26 pm

Dustin, you’re an idiot. If Mr. Gintz were really trying to help your parents, he would have convinced them to sell their homes much earlier before they even reached foreclosure, so they could profit from the sell of their home.

“Mr Gintz has done a lot of good, for a lot of people. My own parents were going to be forced out of thier home if it werent for him. With his assistance they were able to get out of the home with money in thier pockets. Instead of getting kicked out by the bank.”

Umm, if you seriously take a look, your parents were forced out of their home by Mr. Gintz while he took a serious profit from your parents unfortunate situation. He probably just gave your parents a cut from the profit he made so that your parents would have the illusion that they actually came out of the situation with something good.

Truthfully, if your parents had decided to sell their home before having to turn to Mr. Gintz for help, they would have walked away from the deal with a hell of a lot more money.
Jeno says:

November 22, 2006 at 2:26 pm

Dustin, you’re an idiot. If Mr. Gintz were really trying to help your parents, he would have convinced them to sell their homes much earlier before they even reached foreclosure, so they could profit from the sell of their home.

“Mr Gintz has done a lot of good, for a lot of people. My own parents were going to be forced out of thier home if it werent for him. With his assistance they were able to get out of the home with money in thier pockets. Instead of getting kicked out by the bank.”

Umm, if you seriously take a look, your parents were forced out of their home by Mr. Gintz while he took a serious profit from your parents unfortunate situation. He probably just gave your parents a cut from the profit he made so that your parents would have the illusion that they actually came out of the situation with something good.

Truthfully, if your parents had decided to sell their home before having to turn to Mr. Gintz for help, they would have walked away from the deal with a hell of a lot more money.
Ted says:

December 11, 2006 at 10:04 pm

AWESOME! I think condo flipping just jumped the shark err couch! Sign me up!
Ted says:

December 11, 2006 at 5:04 pm

AWESOME! I think condo flipping just jumped the shark err couch! Sign me up!
Celeste Tanner says:

December 13, 2006 at 10:36 pm

Coming soon, to a condo near you, new paint!

I walked past there last night. They’ve added blothches of paint to the side of the building… it looks like they’re planning to repaint the exterior of their (mostly) empty building. Perhaps they think it’s all about paint chips? There appears to be some dark forest green in the vertiginous future.
Celeste Tanner says:

December 13, 2006 at 5:36 pm

Coming soon, to a condo near you, new paint!

I walked past there last night. They’ve added blothches of paint to the side of the building… it looks like they’re planning to repaint the exterior of their (mostly) empty building. Perhaps they think it’s all about paint chips? There appears to be some dark forest green in the vertiginous future.
Eric R. Bitten says:

January 6, 2007 at 3:18 am

Vertigo?

Here’s a taste of Tacoma’s Hitchcock pic…

Gintz Group negotiated shared ownership of the Fawcett House in Tacoma with Fawcett House, LLC. Another rescue operation?

City Officials performed an inspection on this 100 year old building in July 2006, found code violations, and immediately kicked out all residents.

One local press release suggested that the Fawcett House would be razed to make way for student housing and parking for the expanding UW Tacoma. Another press release implied that new ownership intended to remodel the structure.

Click this link to get a feel for what really happened in T-Town:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/6299309p-5493489c.html

Incidentally, the Gintz Group is setting up an office across the street from City Hall in our fair city.

Opinions from our fair(er) city to the north?

Curious in Tacoma.

-Eric
Eric R. Bitten says:

January 5, 2007 at 10:18 pm

Vertigo?

Here’s a taste of Tacoma’s Hitchcock pic…

Gintz Group negotiated shared ownership of the Fawcett House in Tacoma with Fawcett House, LLC. Another rescue operation?

City Officials performed an inspection on this 100 year old building in July 2006, found code violations, and immediately kicked out all residents.

One local press release suggested that the Fawcett House would be razed to make way for student housing and parking for the expanding UW Tacoma. Another press release implied that new ownership intended to remodel the structure.

Click this link to get a feel for what really happened in T-Town:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/6299309p-5493489c.html

Incidentally, the Gintz Group is setting up an office across the street from City Hall in our fair city.

Opinions from our fair(er) city to the north?

Curious in Tacoma.

-Eric
Urban Living - A Seattle condo new construction real estate blog » Vertigo to get less ugly? says:

January 16, 2007 at 2:59 am

[…] One of the most popular articles on Urban Living has been, Ugliest condo building in Seattle? Today I was walking by Vertigo and noticed some test patches on the walls: Vertigo Getting Painted? Hosted on Zooomr […]
brad says:

January 21, 2007 at 9:25 pm

Someone on the original post mentioned something about how this used to be a nice building until they painted it… Had they ever seen it? Before it was really ugly and beige, with some weird King Arthur’s court faux stained glass window next to the front door. (Seattle buildings also seem to hate any color besides brown and beige, but that’s another story.) Now it’s atrocious but at least it is interesting. There’s a bunch of those ugly 60s buildings in gray and beige, and the architecture is so boring and ugly, all you can really do to spruce it up is color. personally, I think the new paint job is an improvement over the old building. (Admittedly, I might have made the colors a bit more subtle, and maybe only used two or three colors.)

Just my two cents.
brad says:

January 21, 2007 at 4:25 pm

Someone on the original post mentioned something about how this used to be a nice building until they painted it… Had they ever seen it? Before it was really ugly and beige, with some weird King Arthur’s court faux stained glass window next to the front door. (Seattle buildings also seem to hate any color besides brown and beige, but that’s another story.) Now it’s atrocious but at least it is interesting. There’s a bunch of those ugly 60s buildings in gray and beige, and the architecture is so boring and ugly, all you can really do to spruce it up is color. personally, I think the new paint job is an improvement over the old building. (Admittedly, I might have made the colors a bit more subtle, and maybe only used two or three colors.)

Just my two cents.
Doug says:

January 31, 2007 at 2:22 am

Paint is happening again, this time with early 70’s earth tones. Better color combo, wrong decade. Agree that the windows are the weak point in this renovation.
Doug says:

January 30, 2007 at 6:22 pm

Paint is happening again, this time with early 70’s earth tones. Better color combo, wrong decade. Agree that the windows are the weak point in this renovation.
Jonathan says:

February 1, 2007 at 11:30 pm

OH RIGHT, re-paint the building SHIT_BROWN… Who are these people?
Jonathan says:

February 1, 2007 at 3:30 pm

OH RIGHT, re-paint the building SHIT_BROWN… Who are these people?
lola says:

May 11, 2007 at 11:58 pm

WOW! What a bunch of winers. Has anyone ever thought of making a suggestion directly to the Gintz Group? Has anyone ever thought about the fact that there WERE heroin addicts living in the stairway. That they loved the history of the building so much they tried to salvage as much as they could. I agree that the first round of colors were a little abrasive. To that end you talked they listended, the colors changed. They are people.
lola says:

May 11, 2007 at 3:58 pm

WOW! What a bunch of winers. Has anyone ever thought of making a suggestion directly to the Gintz Group? Has anyone ever thought about the fact that there WERE heroin addicts living in the stairway. That they loved the history of the building so much they tried to salvage as much as they could. I agree that the first round of colors were a little abrasive. To that end you talked they listended, the colors changed. They are people.
Andy says:

January 1, 2008 at 9:17 pm

Given Mr. Gintz’s checkered personal past (first-hand experience/knowledge), I would strongly advise you not to deal with this con man.
Andy says:

January 1, 2008 at 1:17 pm

Given Mr. Gintz’s checkered personal past (first-hand experience/knowledge), I would strongly advise you not to deal with this con man.
Janis says:

August 13, 2008 at 12:01 am

I to have dealt with David Gintz personally as well, and he is a total con man. He runs his business with his brothers who are ALL con men and idiots to boot. I would not trust him at all even if my life depended on it. He was with Metropolitan Development Group , and they broke off without him because he was a scammer. Not that MDG is any better, Gwen and Casey are a bunch of low lives as well. Crappy employers and even crappier parents. I don’t trust any of them .
Janis says:

August 12, 2008 at 4:01 pm

I to have dealt with David Gintz personally as well, and he is a total con man. He runs his business with his brothers who are ALL con men and idiots to boot. I would not trust him at all even if my life depended on it. He was with Metropolitan Development Group , and they broke off without him because he was a scammer. Not that MDG is any better, Gwen and Casey are a bunch of low lives as well. Crappy employers and even crappier parents. I don’t trust any of them .
free satellite says:

February 8, 2009 at 9:50 am

Development of digital technologies occurs prompt rates. Does not lag behind progress and digital TV. Speaking about digital TV, we first of all mean satellite TV. The digital satellite TV becomes more and more accessible to simple users. The market paid satellite tv also is not necessary on a place. The new digital standard of TV of high clearness HDTV actively develops and takes root. The satellite TV becomes more and more directed on the spectator. Besides digital quality of the image, advantage of satellite systems also is also the extensive cover zone of the companion.
OrientPoker says:

March 17, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Good Luck with condo flipping. Just wonder what happened to this one?
OrientPoker says:

March 17, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Good Luck with condo flipping. Just wonder what happened to this one?
OrientPoker says:

March 17, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Good Luck with condo flipping. Just wonder what happened to this one?
OrientPoker says:

March 17, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Good Luck with condo flipping. Just wonder what happened to this one?
House designs says:

June 6, 2009 at 2:46 am

Not planned to build.. just started building i guess..
Sam lives on Capitol Hill says:

July 29, 2010 at 6:09 am

This building needs to be torn down. Itâ€™s a moldy mess. Prime spot for a developer to rebuild. While your at it, re-do that halfway house across the road with an interior courtyard so the residents can hack and gag and giggle to their heartsâ€™ content out of sight of taxpayers. No one should do business with Gintz Group-slimy scumbags who don't know a thing about construction-only cover up.
Woodworking Project Plans says:

November 26, 2010 at 5:21 pm

WOW! What a bunch of winers.

Ugliest condo building in Seattle?

Ask Matt a Question

Ask us a Question

Keep your finger on the pulse each week