<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lumen Penthouse Finally Done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lulo</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-81011</link>
		<dc:creator>lulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-81011</guid>
		<description>The &#039;avant garde&#039; art was a 13&#039; styrofoam carrot (yes, I said carrot), suspended from the wall at about the 2nd level, complete with a big plume of greenery at the end. Beneath the carrot, sat a 2 - 3&#039; tall porcelin rabbit, &#039;allegedly&#039; sitting on the astroturf.  I say &#039;allegedly&#039;, because I never got to see it and have never seen pictures of it.  I did see the carrot though and it was quite possibly the wierdest art selection for a common area space, I&#039;ve ever heard of.  There HAS to be an interesting story behind it&#039;s selection because it was so odd - a choice by the &#039;famed local designer&#039; intially marketed in relation to the building, Garrett Cord Werner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#39;avant garde&#39; art was a 13&#39; styrofoam carrot (yes, I said carrot), suspended from the wall at about the 2nd level, complete with a big plume of greenery at the end. Beneath the carrot, sat a 2 &#8211; 3&#39; tall porcelin rabbit, &#39;allegedly&#39; sitting on the astroturf.  I say &#39;allegedly&#39;, because I never got to see it and have never seen pictures of it.  I did see the carrot though and it was quite possibly the wierdest art selection for a common area space, I&#39;ve ever heard of.  There HAS to be an interesting story behind it&#39;s selection because it was so odd &#8211; a choice by the &#39;famed local designer&#39; intially marketed in relation to the building, Garrett Cord Werner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lulo</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-79094</link>
		<dc:creator>lulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-79094</guid>
		<description>The &#039;avant garde&#039; art was a 13&#039; styrofoam carrot (yes, I said carrot), suspended from the wall at about the 2nd level, complete with a big plume of greenery at the end. Beneath the carrot, sat a 2 - 3&#039; tall porcelin rabbit, &#039;allegedly&#039; sitting on the astroturf.  I say &#039;allegedly&#039;, because I never got to see it and have never seen pictures of it.  I did see the carrot though and it was quite possibly the wierdest art selection for a common area space, I&#039;ve ever heard of.  There HAS to be an interesting story behind it&#039;s selection because it was so odd - a choice by the &#039;famed local designer&#039; intially marketed in relation to the building, Garrett Cord Werner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#39;avant garde&#39; art was a 13&#39; styrofoam carrot (yes, I said carrot), suspended from the wall at about the 2nd level, complete with a big plume of greenery at the end. Beneath the carrot, sat a 2 &#8211; 3&#39; tall porcelin rabbit, &#39;allegedly&#39; sitting on the astroturf.  I say &#39;allegedly&#39;, because I never got to see it and have never seen pictures of it.  I did see the carrot though and it was quite possibly the wierdest art selection for a common area space, I&#39;ve ever heard of.  There HAS to be an interesting story behind it&#39;s selection because it was so odd &#8211; a choice by the &#39;famed local designer&#39; intially marketed in relation to the building, Garrett Cord Werner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattgoyer</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78604</link>
		<dc:creator>mattgoyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78604</guid>
		<description>Do tell, what all was removed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do tell, what all was removed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nthwest</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78548</link>
		<dc:creator>Nthwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78548</guid>
		<description>No surprise the developer chose not to live there...would you wanted to be reminded what a bath you took on this project? Unfortunately they are still under the illusion that anyone else wants to pay top dollar for this failed project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise the developer chose not to live there&#8230;would you wanted to be reminded what a bath you took on this project? Unfortunately they are still under the illusion that anyone else wants to pay top dollar for this failed project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KMW</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78543</link>
		<dc:creator>KMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78543</guid>
		<description>2100 sq ft * $300 per sq ft = $630k. They are asking for $300k over that, si basically a third of the value of this condo is in highly depreciable interior finishes? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember when they pulled this space from auction and I thought it was rich to describe it as a penthouse, but throwing more money at it like this - now that&#039;s crazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2100 sq ft * $300 per sq ft = $630k. They are asking for $300k over that, si basically a third of the value of this condo is in highly depreciable interior finishes? </p>
<p>I remember when they pulled this space from auction and I thought it was rich to describe it as a penthouse, but throwing more money at it like this &#8211; now that&#39;s crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lulo</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78542</link>
		<dc:creator>lulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78542</guid>
		<description>Yes. This unit was originally being designed for the developer of the property who has chosen not to live there - I think they&#039;re the seller.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite being on the courtyard, the placement of this unit actually does afford it a pretty decent view of the Space Needle from the master bedroom (decent does not mean perfect; decent means the upper 1/3 of the structure).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the astroturf - it was one apsect of a botched, developer-chosen art project which was too avant garde for the residents taste (everything but the astro turf was removed well before the building went to auction, by request of residents). I wouldn&#039;t be surprsied if the HOA replaces the astroturf within a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. This unit was originally being designed for the developer of the property who has chosen not to live there &#8211; I think they&#39;re the seller.  </p>
<p>Despite being on the courtyard, the placement of this unit actually does afford it a pretty decent view of the Space Needle from the master bedroom (decent does not mean perfect; decent means the upper 1/3 of the structure).  </p>
<p>As for the astroturf &#8211; it was one apsect of a botched, developer-chosen art project which was too avant garde for the residents taste (everything but the astro turf was removed well before the building went to auction, by request of residents). I wouldn&#39;t be surprsied if the HOA replaces the astroturf within a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urban</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78540</link>
		<dc:creator>urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78540</guid>
		<description>Go to Redfin and look at the aerial photo.  That courtyard is horrifying!  You are looking straight at the unit across from you... when you dress.. when you eat... when you sleep...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to Redfin and look at the aerial photo.  That courtyard is horrifying!  You are looking straight at the unit across from you&#8230; when you dress.. when you eat&#8230; when you sleep&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam DeBord, SeattleHome.com</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78505</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam DeBord, SeattleHome.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78505</guid>
		<description>Lumen is one interesting project.  A few really nice units, a few &quot;less-than-desireable&quot; design ideas.  Astro-turf in the hallway?  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lumen is one interesting project.  A few really nice units, a few &#8220;less-than-desireable&#8221; design ideas.  Astro-turf in the hallway?  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyS</title>
		<link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2009/10/24/lumen-penthouse-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-78395</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbnlivn.com/?p=1614#comment-78395</guid>
		<description>$443 a square foot and $1600 monthly HOA is crazy for a condo at Lumen, which is widely recognized as a failed development that was auctioned off cheap. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone who has visited can tell you #224 is not really a &#039;penthouse&#039; per se since it&#039;s at the same level as the townhouses and barely two stories above the busy street level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The claimed &quot;$500k in upgrades&quot; doesn&#039;t change that fact, nor does it magically add a view. In my experience, expensive interior upgrades are usually (a) overinflated numbers and (b) add little real value to the property, because most buyers wouldn&#039;t know expensive Pedini cabinets from their elbow. The worst sort of upgrades are audiovisual systems which are immediately outdated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The one advantage is that you could live like Jimmy Stewart in Rear Window - in a fishbowl with a view into your neighbors. You would think the &quot;$500k in upgrades&quot; would include actual Lutron blinds but according to the photo&#039;s and the listing it only includes the wiring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The kicker is the $1685 monthly HOA fees, for a building which doesn&#039;t even have a fitness center.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the recent auction Lumen units sold for $279 s/f to $350 a s/f. I don&#039;t see the justification for nearly doubling the market value for this property, but then I guess a sucker is born every minute.You&#039;d be better off buying a $449k condo and pocketing the $500k and $20k in annual HOA fees for something else, but that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$443 a square foot and $1600 monthly HOA is crazy for a condo at Lumen, which is widely recognized as a failed development that was auctioned off cheap. </p>
<p>Anyone who has visited can tell you #224 is not really a &#39;penthouse&#39; per se since it&#39;s at the same level as the townhouses and barely two stories above the busy street level.</p>
<p>The claimed &#8220;$500k in upgrades&#8221; doesn&#39;t change that fact, nor does it magically add a view. In my experience, expensive interior upgrades are usually (a) overinflated numbers and (b) add little real value to the property, because most buyers wouldn&#39;t know expensive Pedini cabinets from their elbow. The worst sort of upgrades are audiovisual systems which are immediately outdated.</p>
<p>The one advantage is that you could live like Jimmy Stewart in Rear Window &#8211; in a fishbowl with a view into your neighbors. You would think the &#8220;$500k in upgrades&#8221; would include actual Lutron blinds but according to the photo&#39;s and the listing it only includes the wiring.</p>
<p>The kicker is the $1685 monthly HOA fees, for a building which doesn&#39;t even have a fitness center.</p>
<p>At the recent auction Lumen units sold for $279 s/f to $350 a s/f. I don&#39;t see the justification for nearly doubling the market value for this property, but then I guess a sucker is born every minute.You&#39;d be better off buying a $449k condo and pocketing the $500k and $20k in annual HOA fees for something else, but that&#39;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
