urbnlivn, a seattle condo blog

urbnlivn, a seattle condo blog header image 1

Brightly Colored 19th Ave Loft

April 8th, 2008 · 7 Comments

Looking for a brightly colored loft?

Check out this 19th Ave Loft that just came on the market:

19th Ave Loft, 1812 19th Ave #116, Seattle, Washington - Living room

19th Ave Loft, 1812 19th Ave #116, Seattle, Washington - Bedroom

19th Ave Loft, 1812 19th Ave #116, Seattle, Washington - Kitchen

19th Ave Loft, 1812 19th Ave #116, Seattle, Washington - Bathroom

Only $399,950 for 870 square feet.

Personally I’d go for #210. While slightly less square feet, at $379,950, it’s the same dollars a square foot and looks a whole lot more tasteful (at least online.) It’s also been on the market for 54 days so expect some price reductions for both these overpriced units.

Popularity: 22% [?]

Tags: 19th Ave Lofts

Like this blog? Subscribe to new posts via email or via RSS.

Want to start a new discussion? Check out the Urbnlivn Forums.

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Jason // Apr 8, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    The first link seems broken. I like that vivid color scheme, even though the living room might only appeal to Minnesota Vikings fans.

  • 2 Chris // Apr 9, 2008 at 8:13 am

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the 870 sf includes the loft area? So is not a “true 870″ for the purposes of calcing a price/sf

  • 3 Colin // Apr 9, 2008 at 10:04 am

    Thanks — I came across 210 earlier and thought it looked just a little *too* neobrutalist, plus you could fall out of bed into the kitchen. So this place is a nice contrast and shows what you can do with the space.

    But I always want a floorplan with these ads. Closets, layout. When you click through, this thing has a picture of what looks like a 2nd bedroom. Huh? Where? Anyway, just sayin’ that folks might get more bites if ads helped you visualize the whole unit.

  • 4 jo // Apr 9, 2008 at 5:20 pm

    yea, i believe the 19th ave lofts include that balcony in the sq footage

    not a “real” 870..

  • 5 Ryan // Apr 10, 2008 at 9:08 am

    Can we ask real estate photographers to put a moratorium on HDR photography? The results are misleading, at best.

  • 6 nitsuj // Apr 10, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    Is it HDR or just ultra wide angle? I don’t think HDR skews perspective?

  • 7 Colin // Apr 13, 2008 at 2:16 pm

    I’ll forgive them HDR or wide angle (though I’ve seen some pretty entertaining fish-eye pix) as long as a photo is reasonably informative. Could we have a post to rant about bad real estate pictures? I would start with close-ups of the toilet — indoor plumbing is pretty much standard these days, and I really don’t need a photograph to prove there’s a water-closet.

Leave a Comment