Home / Seattle Condos / Top 10 Most Expensive Condo Sales of 2012

Top 10 Most Expensive Condo Sales of 2012

By Matt Goyer January 8, 2013

Seattle Condos

1. $4.25m: 1521 #3800

2. $4.15m: Olive 8 – Ph 1

3. $4m: Madison Tower – Unit 2400

4. $3.6m: 1521 #3503

5. $3.6m: 1521 #3802

6. $3.3m: 1521 #3702

7. $2.4m: Meridian #2701

8. $2.315m: Lakeside #301

9. $2.25m: Olive 8 – Ph 2

10. 105 W Highland Dr – Unit 7

I own and manage Urban Living, a boutique Seattle and Bellevue real estate brokerage. I love lofts, floating homes, new construction, and mid-century moderns, but I will help you buy or sell just about anything!

Get in touch to:

Understand the market
Find your perfect home
Sell your home

Contact:
[email protected]
206-203-6242

5 responses to “Top 10 Most Expensive Condo Sales of 2012”

Shah Kingdom Kharghar says:

January 9, 2013 at 3:05 am

The pictures are given in the articles are very adorable and condos are looking nice. As per real estate concern expensive condos are best place for living.
Sam Cunningham says:

January 14, 2013 at 9:36 am

Interestingly Sotheby’s sold 6 of the 10.
MLS Hunter says:

January 14, 2013 at 9:39 am

And Citrone Partners (Sandy Justen, Sam Cunningham, Julie Biniasz) sold 5 of the Sotheby’s sales- Chris Rossman sold the 6th. Great to see another affirmation the market is back for high profile condos!
Sam Cunningham says:

January 14, 2013 at 2:46 pm

Of the 10 sales, Realogics sotheby’s was 6 of the transactions but represented 9 sides. Very impressive. On a broader market note they also achieved the coveted spot of second fastest growing company in Puget Sound, from the Puget Sound Business Journal. It’s been an exciting year!
Topher says:

January 19, 2013 at 8:23 am

Ummmm, Sandy, Sam, and Julie SHOULD have sold 5 of the Sotheby’s Sales. That is the building (1521 2nd Avenue) you represent for the developer, Opus NW. DUH! And, for the record, it is NOT impressive to consumers for you to represent 9 sides out of 6 transactions. This means you represented both sides of three transactions, which in the real estate industry, is revered as unethical. You can NOT represent the absolute best interest of the buyer, while at the same time represent the the best interest of the seller. That’s like having the District Attorney act as the defendant’s attorney in the same damn court case. Get real, would you? All smoke and mirrors, right?

Top 10 Most Expensive Condo Sales of 2012

Ask Matt a Question

Ask us a Question

Keep your finger on the pulse each week